Friday, March 11, 2016

Speeches to the Board


Dear Board,

My name is Lisa Cooper and I have enjoyed teaching for the Orcutt
Union School District for 20 years. Addressing the Board tonight is a
first for me. Tonight I would like to remind you of what makes our
school district great. It's PEOPLE. It's the people who put their heart and
soul into educating the students of this community. For many of us,
these students are the children and grandchildren of our friends,
neighbors, and colleagues. We teach them, advocate for them, and care
for them as if they were our own. Many of us, having grown up in this
community, feel a responsibility to pay forward what our teachers
instilled in us. A love of learning, confidence in the face of challenges,
and respect for those who take pride in their work. Right now, Orcutt
teachers are not getting the respect that we have earned. The state has
provided the funds for our fair compensation, yet our own School Board
is refusing to make us, the PEOPLE who make this a highly respected
educational community, a priority.

In 2015, I saved $1,400 in receipts for out of pocket classroom
expenditures, knowing I can only write off$250 of this on my taxes.
used my meager classroom budget primarily to purchase construction
paper- a staple in Transitional Kindergarten. A fair cost of living
allowance will allow me to continue supplementing my classroom
budget out of my own pocket, as I have done for 20 years.
Thankfully, my husband, a teacher at SMHS, and I usually receive a
decent tax return each year. But due to the split payroll we saw a loss of
$5,976. This is a hard hit for a family of five with two special needs
children.

Orcutt has always taken pride in offering its teachers a salary schedule
that can compete with local districts. But we have fallen behind and
continue to fall behind. How are we to continue attracting the same
caliber of educators? Temporary teachers are contemplating leaving
Orcutt for higher paying districts and who can blame them? I have
many close friends who teach in Santa Maria Bonita. They are just as
talented and dedicated as we are, but they do NOT work harder than we
do. Please tell me what the incentive is to work the extra hours, come in
on weekends, and spend my own money on my classroom when I make
thousands less than my neighboring colleagues. Due to the teacher
shortage, which is only increasing, many districts will be allowing
teachers to transfer in with more years of credit. We are hearing
numbers like 10 and 15 years- maybe more! It would be heartbreak for
many of us to leave this district that we love and care about But in the
end we have to be able to afford to teach AND take care of our families.
Please invest in the PEOPLE who make this district great by offering an
equitable salary schedule that will continue to bring the BEST teachers
to Orcutt.

Lisa Cooper

Dear Board,

I will leave the particulars of the negotiations to others.  I am here to speak to the issue of communication.  When the members of a group: a family, a football team, a drama troupe or a school district cease to communicate openly and honestly and with respect, then the very foundation of that group begins to erode.  That is a foundation that has been built up over many, many years in this community.  We owe much to those who preceded us.  We need to work hard and commit ourselves to honoring that work. 
Everything we do here and at our respective schools should serve the best interests of our students.  As our letter head says, “Where kids come first.”  As we come together to express our views and try to make ourselves understood, I would hope that we realize that that can only happen if we also seek to understand.  Unfortunately, we oftentimes allow our egos to cloud our vision and keep us from entering into the kind of communication that is needed so badly right here, right now.  The us against them dynamic sends us into a foxhole mentality that leaves no room for progress.  

Please understand that I am talking about all of us here.  Each of us plays a very important role in meeting the daily needs of our students, and we all know how much they sometimes need.  We will be here when our current students have moved on to high school and beyond.  It might feel that we have time to work these things out, but we have to remember that their needs are immediate and often dire.  What happens tomorrow in our classrooms can have a lifelong impact, for better or worse,  for our students.  

What I am asking is that each of us do the best we can to lower our guard, to open our minds and to try to understand what we can do to best fulfill our duties.  In 1914 German, British and French soldiers emerged from their trenches on Christmas Eve and exchanged gifts, sang songs and shared fellowship. To me, that is an inspiring and powerful illustration of the human desire to come together and find a semblance of peace. We, as a community. could embrace that now. If that coming together could occur during war, how much easier should it be for us today?   Thank you!

Beth Karamitsos

Good evening Trustees,

Teaching is a hard job. Nonetheless, it is a career that we love, and that we do effectively.  We work hard to keep up with the ever-changing demands and challenges of education. I have taught in Orcutt for over 26 years. I, like my teaching colleagues, continue to put in many extra hours weekly to make sure the students get what they need. We are the ones that wake up in the middle of the night worrying about how we can help students struggling with the English language, or how we can support 2 brothers who  are now living at the homeless shelter. Our work goes beyond the daily routines of the classroom setting. 

I am a Resource Specialist at Nightingale (part of the special education department). Currently, my caseload is made up of students with learning disabilities, autism, and health impairments.  These students are primarily in the regular education classrooms and come to my classroom for a small portion of their day to get academic help. However, their regular  education home-room teachers have taken on the additional responsibilities of IEP meetings, special behavioral plans, compiling data, individualized curriculum, and additional collaboration time for these special needs students. Teachers carry out these extra, unnoticed, often unappreciated, and never compensated  duties. It is a demonstration of their value of putting kids first.

Each special education student comes with an individualized educational plan. As teachers, and as a district, we are obligated by law to fulfill  the services, supports, and accommodations of these individualized plans. We are facing increasing student numbers to our special education  department and many of our caseloads are bursting at the seams. We have 500 special education students who receive services, not quite 10% of our total student population. The California State Dept. of Education has a cap on the number of students that can be on the caseloads of resource specialists - that cap has been exceeded. 

We are already facing a teacher shortage here in Orcutt in our special education department.  In spite of ongoing, valiant efforts by our pupil services director, there have been unfilled positions for a speech pathologist, an additional resource specialist, instructional assistants. One speech pathologist accepted a position last year, but changed her mind when she saw how much the cost of housing is here. 

Who pays when we cannot attract enough special educators? General education teachers do, special educators do, but most importantly our students do— they are the ones who need and deserve the most  support. We have a director who is supportive and tirelessly works to maintain our special education programs at a high level.  But she cannot control the numbers, the economy, or the salaries.

I am urging you to reconsider your position on our contract, so we can attract the special ed. teachers that we so desperately need. By your current stance, you are making a hard job even harder. We are not money hungry thieves who want to bankrupt the district. We are asking for what is fair, reasonable, and reflects a district that respects what we do as teachers.  We would like to return to a day in which the members of the board and administration are not our adversaries, but our supporters.

Jenny Brennan

Hello,
            My name is Cheri Craft.  I have been a teacher in this district for 23 years, and like many of my colleagues, this is my first time ever speaking at a board meeting, and I can’t say it’s a bucket list kind of thing.  I do, however, feel more frustrated than ever before and I want to share why.

Teachers are Givers!

            Yes, we have a very demanding job.  But we chose it.  We understand the planning, learning new curriculum, differentiating for each student, interacting with every parent, dealing with various academic/social/emotional needs, the importance of building up children’s self esteem, helping children learn how to interact and work together while still learning the core subjects, the paperwork and grading that often takes place in the evenings and on weekends, etc. etc.  The job is very difficult and very demanding but it is also very rewarding.

However, there’s more!  There are “Extra-Curricular” activities (clubs, committees, coaching, etc.) and these positions need to be filled primarily by teachers.   Teachers fill these positions, often for free; and meetings are often held during lunch or after school.   Again,

Teachers Are Givers!

I have always prided myself on my willingness and openness to try new things, to participate fully, to say yes. 

For instance, I’ve said yes to being a:
·      Battle of the Books Coach
·      Math Bowl Coach
·      Safe School Ambassadors Facilitator
·      Student Council Coordinator
·      Talent Show Coordinator
·      Odyssey of the Mind Coach
·      Tech mentor
·      Student Teacher Mentor
·      BTSA Mentor
·      GATE teacher
·      Adoption Committee participant
·      RTI Task Force Member, most recently, and the list goes on.

I’ve spent time away from my family to attend many conferences to improve my craft including the:
·      Reading Conference
·      GATE Conference
·      Math Conference
·      CUE Conference
·      CPM Conference
·      PLC Conference and more.

I’ve also attended countless county workshops and traveled to several “Site Visits” to observe other schools implementing best practices.   And I am not alone.

The point is that I have GIVEN to this district on a consistent basis.  I’ve worked hard and I don’t feel that my work is being valued, as it should.  It seems to me that when a company values an employee, they respect and reward them in some way and that, usually, comes in the form of compensation. 

I quote from a tech commercial I recently saw: “Your employees define your business, your people ARE your business.  Stand behind them, put them first.”

I didn’t go into teaching to become rich; I did so because I wanted to do my best to make a difference for kids.  I, along with all of my colleagues in this very room, are doing just that, AND THEN SOME!  And, we deserve fair and RESPECTFUL compensation for that.

Cheri Craft


Dear Board,


I believe that each of us in this room want the same thing – we want to make a difference for the Orcutt district. We may go about it differently, but there isn’t anyone here who is in it just for themselves. So what has happened that we have arrived at such a mess as this? More importantly……..what can we do to change the atmosphere?
There are two very important tools that I use in my classroom that we can and must use.  I am certain that our fortunes as a group of people hinge on two critical factors –respect and proximity
Respecting a student means observing how hard they work, learning what struggles they face, and measuring my words to ensure that I encourage and support their efforts. My success as a teacher does not depend on the right curriculum or the number of contact minutes, but on how I treat my students as individuals. If they do not think I care about them, they will not thrive under my leadership. They must learn by watching my actions and listening to my words that I care deeply about what happens to them. For the year that they are entrusted to me, they must become my priority.

Proximity is much more fun to demonstrate, but no less important. If I teach from the front of the room and never get near a student, they do not get the message that they are important to me. I choose to move around because of what it says to my students – your teacher likes you! We cannot have a healthy relationship with our students from afar. Proximity says “You are important to me; what you do is valuable”. I want to see what you’re up to!
As a teacher, I don’t think I can have one without the other. If I say I respect and care about my students, but I am distant and silent – what will they assume? If I do not work to know them, be inconvenienced so that they are a priority – how will they ever get the message that I am on their team?


Teachers….we need to change some of our ways. We must be willing to set aside negative assumptions. We must recognize that we’re all on the same boat, and we all – administrators, the school board, our parents and fellow staff - must row together or we will eventually sink. We have to be willing to share, clearly but kindly, what we feel. We need to be willing to get up close and use proximity.

·      School Board….Dr. Blow…..these are difficult times in Orcutt. Everyone in this room understands that we do not have the income of other districts. We all get it. We also clearly understand that what is at stake is not really just salary. It is not working hours. It is not benefits, or the technology we might use. It is our future to attract and keep new teachers. It is the need for leadership that demonstrates respect. And it is an aching need for a school board and a superintendent who use proximity to show what is important.
Get to know us; observe how hard we work, what we struggle with. Measure your words carefully. We are listening, we need encouragement and we need to know that we are valued.
Use proximity. None of us can lead from behind a table. Get out in the schools. Talk to teachers. We want a healthy relationship between OEA, the administrators and the school board. It would make Orcutt stand out; it is not the norm, but it should be. We are……….ALL……in this together.   

Roberta Hough

Dear Board,

My name is Janell Provost.  In my 16 years of teaching in Orcutt, I have never spoken in front of the school board.  On October 26, one of my fellow Special Ed. teachers came to you and asked for help.  She and her family (which included a newly adopted infant daughter) asked you for a favor which would have cost the district nothing extra.  The help she and her family asked for was refused.  In my mind, we are a family in Orcutt.  In my mind, this AMAZING teacher was following Orcutt’s motto, by putting her students first each and every day, in one of our classrooms where students need the most daily support.  She even tutored Special ed. students over the summer.  I can’t think of a more heroic way to put students/children first, than to adopt one like she and her husband did.

This heroic teacher’s baby daughter was born on October 3 and was in a Newborn Intensive Care Unit in Santa Cruz for 10 days.  This teacher was able to utilize her seven (7) personal necessity days, and five (5) AB 109 days which gave her a total of twelve (12) days.  However, because her baby was born 3 months before January, she sadly discovered that our California law only allowed maternity or paternity leave for babies born naturally to parents and she did not have the same rights as a biological mother   It was a painful experience to learn that she could not receive differential pay while on leave like her peers who were biological mothers. 
This is a law that our very own Monique Segura (along with a committee), was instrumental in changing, in Sacramento, and it went into effect on January 1, 2016.  This law is entitled AB-375 School employees: sick leave: paternity and maternity leave.  It now allows for, “maternity or paternity leave which means leave for reason of the birth of a child of the employee, or the placement of a child with an employee in connection with the adoption or foster care of the child by the employee”.  According to this law, which changed only 3 months after her baby was born she would have been allowed the differential pay after her sick leave was exhausted.
You, the school board also had the right to approve this “maternity or paternity” leave to be extended to adopting parents as well as biological parents.  On October 26, this teacher, asked you, the school board to allow the AB-375 law, which took effect January 1, 2016, to be deemed appropriate for her situation.  Her very humble request was denied.
In my mind, professional athletes are NOT heroes.  In my mind, movie stars and rock stars are NOT heroes.  To me, anyone who puts a child first is my hero.  Teachers and parents who adopt children are my heroes.  My friend Monique Segura, who adopted her 3 daughters, and went to Sacramento to help change laws in order to help parents, is my hero.
This teacher has resigned and Orcutt has lost an EXCELLENT special ed. teacher.  This is a teacher who is part of a district who prides itself in the motto that Students Come First.  Well, her newborn adopted baby is a potential future student in Orcutt.  We are ALL begging you to remember that you can’t put students first when you put their parents and teachers last.  
But, what’s most tragic is that Orcutt Union School District has lost one of its heroes.

Janell Provost


Dear Board,


When it came time to go to college I worked three jobs to put myself through school.  When I started teaching with the Orcutt School District, I went back to working three jobs.  While being a brand new teacher and all the hours that required, I worked at Delta doing independent study and I waitressed at Red Lobster at night.  Working that hard was nothing new to me and I did not look at it as an embarrassment that I had to work at a restaurant sometimes serving my own students.  Sometimes you have to do what you have to do.  However, I think a school district should be embarrassed if their teachers can't make enough of an income to be able make a decent living in the community in which they live.  Further to become a teacher is no small thing; the education required, the multiple tests needing to be passed, the months of non-paid student teaching. Is it surprising there is an astronomical drop in people becoming teachers?  Perhaps millennials don’t want to be tens of thousands of dollars in debt and then have a teacher’s salary to live on. Perhaps millennials are not interested in working in a very stressful job, being accountable for the education of 30+ children, their safety, character development, communicating with 30+ sets of parents who range from thinking you’re doing a great job for their child to that you’re the devil incarnate. Perhaps millennials don’t want to work 9 hours a day for which they are only paid for 6 ½ . Or work for free on the weekends and during the summer.

But we all know that no person becomes a teacher to become wealthy.  But what about just getting paid what a baby sitter makes?  After 16 years teaching, I've calculated that I make before taxes $2.30 per student per hour. That’s $2.30 for my contract hours only…not the time I work after school, in the evenings, etc. Now I pay my babysitters almost 2 times that amount to watch my two boys.  If you have kids you know how valuable having a great baby sitter is...but here's the thing.....my babysitters never taught my boys to read, my baby sitters have never taught my boys their math facts, or algebra, They never heard about ancient civilizations, nor anything about plate tectonics from a sitter.  My sitters have never worked with my boys on creating movies or editing video footage.  Further, my baby sitters have never graded a single paper while she was on the clock getting paid....and I certainly never handed a pile of papers to a sitter and asked for her to grade them on her own time.  My babysitter has never sat in an IEP again neither paid nor unpaid.  My sitter has never done 3 to 4 straight hours of parent conferences several days in a row where only half of that time was time where she was being compensated.  My babysitter has never had to answer email, after email from a parent wondering why their student is failing when their student never turns in any work.  My babysitter has never had to have a heart to heart with any student begging them to engage in their education and not give up.  My sitters have never had to hug a student while they cried because their home lives are such a mess, or explain to them that their step parent doesn’t really hate them, or carry the heart ache of listening to a student share that they are so stressed out because their mom drinks and hasn't come home in 3 days. My sitter has never done any of these things....But I have....I've done all of them and so much more.  I do it gladly for my students.  But I don't do it so that I can be taken for granted by my school district who counts on teachers to sacrifice and give, give, give, because we love what we do and we love our students.  I know that I will never see a salary that would come close to being what my babysitter makes per hour per kid.... BUT DO I THINK I AM WORTH THAT MUCH???, for the job I do, for the impact I have on the students.  Absolutely.  Why don't you?
Tania Kim

Dear Board,

Good evening honored board members, administrators, teachers and guests.  My name is Valerie Trenev and I teach sixth grade at Alice Shaw.  I have been a teacher with the Orcutt Union School District for 20 years.  The focus of my short speech is Our Legacy.  I place the emphasis on the word “our”.  Together we have journeyed through the years educating and raising literally thousands of Orcutt youth.  Orcutt is special because of the Orcutt Union School District.  When I think back to when I first started in this district thoughts come to my mind like – “Orcutt is the place to be”. “It’s better in Orcutt.“ I was actually offered a job elsewhere and I chose Orcutt, because it was the best.  In my first years, at Orcutt Junior High, I can remember several special family members related to our current board.  Your son, Mr. Buchanan was there.  I remember what an honor it was to know that he was there at our school.  Mrs. Zilli – remember that trip to Magic Mountain where you asked me to go on that extreme roller coaster twice?  You know how that turned out.  Mr. Hatch – helped my fifth graders who were trying to make Santa Maria a better place with their class project Mission Possible, Change Santa Maria?  Your donation helped to strengthen our project and make it award winning.  Dr. Peterson, you are a revered member of our community.  Ms. Phillips and Dr. Blow – you are “newer to our district”, but what a great start you’ve both had here.  We are excited about new programs and having our district be the best ever. Truly, together, we have journeyed through the years.  

Creating lasting memories, educating children and giving the youth of our community the best start they could have.  My own son, already 15 – is a sophomore at Righetti and a great water polo player.   My daughter Laura is 20 years old now – a junior at SDSU – wanting to be a pharmacist.  These two young people and many more have had their start in our great district.  We need to keep the OUSD tradition strong.  The youth of our community need and deserve it.  Strong schools make a strong community.  We are at an important turning point.  Our demographics are changing.  There are more needy families.  There are tough decisions to be made.  As a veteran teacher of your district, I urge you to make the decision to continue to invest in our community the way you have in the past.  Investing in our schools, by respecting and supporting our teachers at this time is a win-win-win.  The students clearly win by having better instruction with high quality teachers.  Our families win by their children being properly educated.  Our neighborhoods win because, with a good education comes young people that care about their community.  Property values can remain high.  Our schools depend upon a stable teaching force.  Stability among teachers is what makes our schools strong.  Teachers who remain at their sites for a given length of time can fine-tune their teaching through consistent collaboration with each other over the course of years.  We want and need our teachers to stay.  We want and need to attract and retain good, quality teachers.  We want and need teachers who are at the top of their class.  Our students deserve that.  To attract and retain quality teachers through offering a competitive wage, shows respect to not only the teachers, but to our community because you care enough to give our students the very best.

We will all eventually move on. New board members will fill the vacancies.  New people will become our administrators.  New people will fill the teaching positions.  What will our legacy be?  How will we be remembered?


The decision is before you.  Please make the right decision. Support us. Respect us. Support our community. Invest in the Orcutt of tomorrow.  Thank you.

Valerie Trenev

Monday, March 7, 2016

OEA's Response to Dr. Blow's Letter of March 3, 2016

The Reality of Putting Students and Teachers First

Schools in California must confront a new reality.  Last year, California issued teaching credentials to only 11,497 new teachers.  Meanwhile, teachers began to leave the profession in record numbers, heading off into retirement and into more highly-paid professions. Over the next ten years, California schools will lose one third of its teachers to retirement, and currently there will not be enough qualified professionals to replace them.

In this new reality, teachers do not compete for the best positions; school districts compete in recruiting the best teachers.  Many districts have reacted by significantly increasing pay and even offering hiring bonuses.  However, this has not been the case for the Orcutt Union School District.  Right now, the average teacher could walk to a school just a few blocks away and make at least $8,000 more per year.  In fact, some of our best teachers have already done so and have become the favorite teachers of children in surrounding school districts instead of in ours. 
Our school board has thrown up its hands when facing this problem, claiming it does not have the money to offer competitive salaries.  The result has meant an increasing turnover rate, an increasing amount of first-year teachers, and an increasing amount of teachers who have emergency credentials.  We represent these teachers and believe they have great potential, but it will be increasingly hard to run successful schools that are made up of a higher percentage of staff who are new to the profession and new to the area.  The people who are going to suffer the most are your children who are taught in a district on its way to becoming a farm league for other districts that offer attractive salaries.  Since 2013, over half of our high school teachers have left for other districts.  Some of those teachers were the very reason that students were attracted to OA in the first place.

As a union, we do not believe this district has done the real soul searching necessary to solve the problem.  They claim poverty but spend hundreds of thousands on German-engineered furniture and millions on iPads and MacBooks that only make their way into the hands of a few select students.  Increasingly, the district spends on what is flashy, new, and disposable without investing in the highly-educated and durable teaching force that running a high-performing school district really requires.

When confronted, the district frequently points to numbers and suggests that working towards offering teachers a competitive salary will mean layoffs, increased class size, reduced art and PE programs, reduced resources, and decreases to site maintenance.  Indeed, the district’s letter asks Orcutt residents to believe that Orcutt teachers are a greedy, selfish group that is willing to sacrifice the solvency of the district and the quality of education provided to district students in favor of short-term, personal gain. The claim that teachers would see the destruction of the students and the schools that they helped to build and work tirelessly to preserve is not only false, it’s divisive and it’s dangerous.  It speaks to the district’s view that teachers are a self-interested workforce to be managed, not the reason for its robust educational programs and success.  It should not be up to the teachers to force the school board to put its spending priorities in the correct order, but we will if we have to.  The district is correct in saying that “your students’ educational success is not at risk” because there is a dedicated and determined staff to make sure that this district has a successful future. 

When the district claims that offering a competitive salary schedule will break the solvency of the district and result in cuts to programs across the board, the district’s numbers don’t add up, and are sometimes outright incorrect.

According to the district’s letter, it spends “approximately 45% of the total budget” on certificated salaries, including the 2015/16 school year.  It does not.  According to the Second Interim Report (the most recent data released from the district), less than 39% of the budget is being spent on certificated salaries this school year.  Any elementary student in Orcutt can tell you that’s a difference of 6%:  39% is not 45%.  In truth, the last time that teacher salaries made up 45% of the budget was in 2012/13, and it has declined every year since, while the budget has increased every year since.  The money keeps going up, but the portion of it that teachers receive keeps going down.  Simply stated, the value that the district places on teachers gets less every year. 

If the district was to do what it claims—what it has the capability of doing—and spent 45% of its budget on certificated salaries, it would have to give Orcutt teachers a 15.3% raise to meet that figure.  So in light of the districts own intention and ability to provide a 15.3% increase to teachers’ salaries, the 9.5% that the union is requesting is more than fair.  There is no chance that a 9.5% raise would cause any risk at all to your child’s educational success; it would not threaten programs or class size or facilities in any way.  What it would do, however, is mitigate the wage gap and be a step towards ensuring that Orcutt students are provided with the best teaching staff possible.
 
It is the duty of the school board to attract and retain a highly-qualified teaching staff that will, in turn, create the dynamic and successful educational programs that Orcutt residents have come to expect from its teachers and its schools.  No one is going to move into the Orcutt Union School District because of its furniture; they move here because of its teachers.  Surely, the district’s spending priorities should put teachers at the top, but over the last few years, while there has been an increase in the percentage of the budget spent on consultant fees, administrative salaries, technology, and furniture, the percentage spent on teacher salaries keeps going down.  Teachers and students are literally not being put first in Orcutt Union School District, despite what the slogan says.

Orcutt Educators’ Association

Monday, February 22, 2016

Board Meeting Speakers

Hello,
My name is Jeff Pawley and I am a teacher at Lakeview Junior High.  I have taught in the Orcutt Union District for the past 27 years and this is the first time that I have spoken at a school board meeting.  Obviously, something has fired-me-up, otherwise I wouldn't be here speaking to you now.  I met with my tax-preparer yesterday and we figured out my taxes for 2015.

On October 16, 2015, the district notified the teachers that they were switching our current payroll system to a new payroll system, and that instead of receiving our usual paycheck at the beginning of January 2016, we would now be receiving our paycheck at the end of December, 2015. For the past 27 years in this district, I received a paycheck at the beginning AND the end of January, and then at the end of the rest of the months of the year (excluding December). That means I received 12 checks a year. This year they moved that paycheck to the end of December, which means that I received 13 checks for the calendar year. By moving that paycheck one week earlier (actually three days), it cost me over $3,000 in additional taxes!  Even though I didn't make one-cent more than I usually do, on paper it appeared that my wife and I made an additional $17,600.

Since that $17,600 was additional income above our normal income, it put us in a higher tax bracket.  So $9,000 of that was taxed at 25% equaling $2,200 in Federal taxes and another $800 in state taxes.  This is money that we will never get back.  When I signed my contract, I had an option to receive 10 or 12 checks, NOT 13 checks!  In essence, you have unilaterally imposed a 3.4% pay cut on my wife and myself. I want to know why this change had to be made? Was this a result of a change in county or state law? If so, please cite the law for me so I can better understand this issue. If you can't cite a specific law on why this needed to happen, then I will look forward to receiving a $3,000 reimbursement check for the money you cost me.  Thank you, Jeff Pawley. Lakeview Junior High school.

Hello,     
My name is Steve Harris and I have been a teacher in the Orcutt Union School District for 20 years, as well as a parent in the district for the last 11. As both a parent and teacher I am concerned about the future of our schools. Faced before our school district and you, the board, is the on-going negotiations with the Orcutt Educators Association. I feel that it is important that fair bargaining agreements about teaching conditions and compensation be reached. This is for the benefit of all involved.     

The problem faced by the teachers of this district is one of fairness and respect. As it has been made clear lately in the local media, the Orcutt teachers are the lowest paid in the Santa Maria valley. A typical teacher with 10 years of experience earns nearly $17,000 less per year in the Orcutt School District than in Santa Maria. That’s $17,000 in just one year! This comes out to a huge “chunk of change” over the next 20 years of a teacher’s career! While having this much extra income is important to anyone, it is especially important to people new to the teaching profession. And it is these new teachers that our district must be most concerned about.     

You see, the Orcutt Union School District, like California as a whole, is on the brink of a teacher shortage crisis.  According to many studies, California will need 100,000 teachers over the next decade. The demand for new teachers will be at its highest, when the number of newly qualified educators coming out of college will be at its lowest. Now, let’s look at how this plays out for the Orcutt schools and its students.     

The Orcutt School District is an aging district. Like the state, nearly 1/3 of our teachers will be retiring in the next decade. That means the district will have to hire about 100 new teachers just to replace retirees. Now, with a teacher shortage looming in the near future, how do you propose to do that? Are you going to recruit new teachers right out of school? That would be nearly impossible considering that with few new educators available to hire, they could easily make nearly $9,000 more in the first year just by signing on elsewhere! We all know how expensive it is to live on the Central Coast. Add to that the additional financial burden of student loans, and a new teacher would be crazy to hire on to the Orcutt School District when they could make substantially more just a few miles away. It’s a “no-brainer”. Even though our district will desperately need them, new teachers will not want to work for the Orcutt Schools!      

So, that leaves us with who is left to hire to replace our retirees? Poorly qualified individuals with emergency teaching credentials? I don’t know about you, but these aren’t the kinds of educators I want teaching my children. So the Orcutt Union School District is going to find itself left behind because they cannot compete with other districts on teacher salaries.I ask you then, when your representatives go back to the negotiations table next month, have them keep these facts in mind. Propose a more fair and respectful compensation that can not only help current teachers, but can help pave the way for another generation of excellent teachers in Orcutt. Let’s truly make the OUSD a place where Kids can come First, and stay there!Thank you.

Monday, January 25, 2016

Negotiations Update - Impasse - Jan 25th

Aloha,

Orcutt Educator's Association and the Orcutt Union School District have been unable to reach agreement on contract articles governing compensation, working days and hours, term, grievance, and class size.  As a result, we have declared impasse and expect to meet with the district and a moderator early next month.  A key disagreement continues concerning the raise to the salary schedule; the district has not increased its offer of 3% since November, 2015.

The association and the district were able to reach a tentative agreement on new stipends (Article X, Appendix B3) for elementary and junior high robotics advisers ($800 annually), and an MOU for stipends for PLC leads (up to 8) at all sites ($1200 annually).  Additionally, we agreed to an MOU that will add one PD day to the beginning of the year compensated at a member's per diem rate for the 2016-17 school year only.  The PD day agenda will be set with input from the association.  

As always feel free to contact me with questions, comments, and/or concerns.

Mahalo,

Monique L. Segura
President, Orcutt Educators Association
805-714-9861